CMM Technology | Enhancing Workplace Safety
Fax: 8-9204-2522
CFMEU v BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd [2016]
Legal Rulings
CMM Technology™ is one of the leading supplier of drug and alcohol testing solutions in Australia, specialising in both workplace drug and alcohol testing, and workplace hydration.
-
DOWNLOAD PDF
![CFMEU v BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd [2016]](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20180831105118-300x201.jpg)
CFMEU v BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd [2016]
Dispute over a process to change the criteria for assessment for drug testing of workers.DOWNLOAD PDF -
DOWNLOAD PDF
Arnott’s Biscuits Ltd v United Voice; AMWU; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Pl
Dispute concerning the introduction of alcohol and other drugs policy – method of testing – examination of urinalysis or oral fluid testing – detection times of various illicit drugs – privacy issues in providing urine samples – is proposed urinDOWNLOAD PDF -
DOWNLOAD PDF
2010 – Holcim (Australia) Pty Limited v. Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales
This dispute concerns the issue of drug and alcohol testing in the transport industry.DOWNLOAD PDF -
VIEW
![[2015] FWC – CFMEU v Port Kembla Coal Terminal](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170918173756-3.jpg)
[2015] FWC – CFMEU v Port Kembla Coal Terminal
Appeal against decision to allow PKCT to use urine testing in their AOD program -
VISIT SITE
![[2013] Raymond Briggs v AWH Pty Ltd](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170817114726-300x187.jpg)
[2013] Raymond Briggs v AWH Pty Ltd
Appeal against unfair dismissal for refusing a drug test.VISIT SITE -
VIEW
![[2012] FWC – Endeavour Energy v CEPU NSW](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170817123004-300x187.jpg)
[2012] FWC – Endeavour Energy v CEPU NSW
Dispute over change of policy and BAC levels and urine or oral fluid testing. -
VIEW
![[2012] Appeal – FWA – Endeavour Energy v CEPU NSW](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170817124131-300x187.jpg)
[2012] Appeal – FWA – Endeavour Energy v CEPU NSW
Appeal against decision - introduction of new AOD policy -
VIEW
![[2011] FWC – CFMEU v HWE Mining Pty Limited](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170817133712-300x187.jpg)
[2011] FWC – CFMEU v HWE Mining Pty Limited
Should HWE introduce oral fluid testing -
DOWNLOAD PDF
![[2009] Caltex Australia Limited v Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170817145532-300x187.jpg)
[2009] Caltex Australia Limited v Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers
Dispute over the introduction of random drug testingDOWNLOAD PDF -
VIEW
![[1998] BHP v CFMEU](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170817154417-300x187.jpg)
[1998] BHP v CFMEU
Introduction of Drug Testing Program -
VIEW
![[2008] AIRC – Shell Refining (Australia) Pty Ltd, Clyde Refinery v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170808103317-300x187.jpg)
[2008] AIRC – Shell Refining (Australia) Pty Ltd, Clyde Refinery v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
Should Shell be required to restrict initial random drug testing of operators to oral fluid testing? -
VIEW
![[2014] FWC – DP World v Maritime Union](https://cmm.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/20170804122904-300x187.jpg)
[2014] FWC – DP World v Maritime Union
Appeal against a decision to introduce oral fluid testing rather than urine testing.
